The context layer for your AI agents
AI's constraint is context, not intelligence. Your agents cannot hold hundreds of repos, thousands of resources, and every ownership rule in a context window. OpsLevel gives them the curated, governed answer instead.
The seniority gap
A senior engineer knows your org. Your agent does not.
The gap is not raw ability. It is how much of what the agent knows it can actually act on inside your organization.
A senior engineer on your team
General knowledge and knowledge of your org overlap. Most of what they know, they can act on.
An AI agent without OpsLevel
Enormous general knowledge, almost no knowledge of your org. The useful zone barely exists.
What your agent doesn’t know
Your catalog makes your coding agents effective
Your agent already knows more about Rails than anyone on your team. What it doesn’t know is your org. Which of these 40 services is tier 1, what pages someone at 3am, who to tag on the PR, and which one is mid-incident right now. That’s the difference between a senior engineer and a brilliant new hire, and it’s exactly what the catalog holds.
The map: your organization
- Ownership, so an agent routes work to the team that actually maintains the service
- Dependencies, so it understands blast radius before it changes anything
- Tiers and criticality, so it treats a payments service differently from an internal tool
- Lifecycle and architecture, so it builds on the canonical path and not the deprecated one
The moment: live state
- Deploys, incidents, and on-call, so it knows what is happening right now
- Vulnerabilities, scorecard results, and failing checks, so it knows what is already broken
- Correlated across GitHub, AWS, Datadog, PagerDuty, and 40 more sources, continuously
Where the context comes from
We correlate context across your architecture, then hand it to your agents
Your architecture
How it gets in
Correlated in
Out to your agents
Governance you already have
Your standards are agent guardrails
The rules that already govern how your engineers build now govern how your agents act. No new governance layer to stand up.
- “Every service has an owner” becomes a precondition agents check before acting
- Granular RBAC gives every user and agent scoped, least-privilege access
The payoff
The same prompt, twice
Same agent, same question. The only difference is whether it has your organization to work from.
“Which of our services use Rails 6 and who owns them?”
No owner, no tier, no answer it can act on.
+ 8 more components, all with owning teams
Owning team, tier, and check status on every one.
840 tokens against 9,700 is the evidence that the context is curated. The answer being right is the point.
Why accuracy matters more now
Before agents, a wrong service owner cost you an hour. With agents acting autonomously, it is the wrong PR on the wrong service, at scale. Accurate catalog data stops being hygiene and becomes a safeguard.
Connect any agent in one step
Hosted MCP server with OAuth. A CLI with predictable, scriptable commands agents chain into real workflows. An API-first platform underneath.
Available to all OpsLevel customers at no additional cost.
FAQs
A hosted Model Context Protocol server that exposes your OpsLevel catalog, standards, and self-service actions to any MCP-compatible agent. Connect it once with OAuth and your agents can query components, owners, dependencies, and check results directly.
Anything that speaks MCP, including Claude Code, Cursor, and GitHub Copilot. The CLI and API cover agents you build in-house, so you are not limited to a fixed list of integrations.
Agents authenticate as first-class identities and inherit OpsLevel RBAC. Scope each one to the teams, components, and actions it needs. Every query and action is attributed to a person or an agent in the audit log.
Source code tells an agent how a service is written. It does not tell it who owns the service, what tier it is, what it depends on, or whether it is mid-incident. OpsLevel answers those directly, so the agent acts on facts instead of inferring them. Using far fewer tokens is a side effect of the context being curated.
The MCP server, CLI, and API are available to all OpsLevel customers at no additional cost.
No. Developers stay in the editors and agents they already use. OpsLevel is where those agents get their bearings.
